[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [xml] Patches to 2.3.4
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- To: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] Patches to 2.3.4
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 07:40:43 -0500
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 02:07:34PM -0600, xml thewrittenword com wrote:
>
> The problem is that error.c uses vsnprintf with NO #ifdef wrapper.
> And, if someone doesn't have snprintf, they definitely don't have
> vsnprintf.
Right, that clearly had to be fixed !
> > If you try to circumvent it the way you suggest then all your
> > binaries ends up having that duplicated code which should be shared
> > in the libc.
> > Last but not least if there is a bug in this code there is no
> > simple way to fix it, you need checking and fixes on all the
> > applications.
> >
> > So on theoretical grounds I'm inclined to not add the patch.
> > Practically this may be better to have all platforms reuse those
> > 800 lines of code than having #ifdef #else #endif scattered around
> > the places where I need snprintf and vsnfprintf.
> >
> > I will need to think a bit more about it, feedback welcome.
>
> Makes sense. How about the patch below?
Fine, applied, I assume it fixes the compilation problem on SGI and
Solaris, right ?
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/
veillard redhat com | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]