Re: [xml] Feature request: callbacks

[yves mail2 vlaanderen net]

On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 07:27:44AM -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>   Honnestly I'm not found of it:
>    - it's complex, and I don't see why this complexity is required.
>      It's time to show up a really convincing example...
>    - testing whether a callback and what callback should be called
>      is complex, and that's an operation which is likely to happen
>      in a number of speed critical places
>    - even I have trouble understanding how it is supposed to work,
>      I'm afraid of the consequences for application writers.
>    - the per-document or per-node callback is not dependant on the
>      node or de document to which this applies, so what's the use
>      of such a switch (if if has to be node dependant, this mean
>      adding one more pointer to the node structure and I say NO
>      in advance) ? I think this swicth is better located in the
>      application handler.

Isn't this feature part of DOM2 Mutation Events ? What's the reason why it
should be part of the node tree api ?

Greetz,

Yves