Hum, that's not clean. I guess it's rather 382: return((char*)xmlCharStrdup(line_read)); but is the casting OK? <<xmllint.diff>> > -----Original Message----- > From: Henke, Markus > Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 2:13 PM > To: 'xml gnome org' > Subject: Use of 'strdup' in 'xmllint.c' > > Hello, > > in 'xmllint.c' (libxml2-2.4.12) we have > > 382: return(strtrdup(line_read)); > > Am i right that it should be > > 382: return(xmlStrdup(line_read)); > > ? > > << File: xmllint.diff >> > > Mit freundlichen Gruessen - Kind regards > Markus Henke > > > ________________________Addressed by:________________________ > ORDAT GmbH & Co. KG - Serversystems / eCom > Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Markus Henke Fon: +49 (641) 7941-0 > Rathenaustr. 1 Fax: +49 (641) 7941-132 > 35394 Gießen mailto:markus henke ordat com > See: http://www.ordat.com > _____________________________________________________________ > ...this behavior is by design...
Attachment:
xmllint.diff
Description: Binary data