Re: [Vala] posix.vapi additions (signal)
- From: "Michael 'Mickey' Lauer" <mickey vanille-media de>
- To: vala-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Vala] posix.vapi additions (signal)
- Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:00:02 +0100
Am Thursday 05 February 2009 16:04:04 schrieb Ed Schouten:
* Jürg Billeter <j bitron ch> wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 02:07 +0100, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
Please add to posix.vapi:
Thanks, committed.
Wouldn't it have been better to make this type safe? We could have used
enumerations for this. Signal.INT or something.
Personally, I think that's overkill for the posix binding, but it's Jürgs call
of course.
I also don't really
agree there are definitions for non-standard signals there. What is a
SIGCLD?
It's a synonym for SIGCHLD used in lots of older code. When I submitted my
contribution I though I might as well strive for completeness. Feel free to
submit a patch that removes it, if it bothers you too much.
--
:M:
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]