Re: [Vala] gtk widget bindings complete

[gege2061 <gege2061 redaction-developpez com>]

The only information I have on the wiki :
http://live.gnome.org/GObjectIntrospection and
http://live.gnome.org/Vala/Bindings

And un look rapidly the .gi files in vala sources :

<signal name="clicked" when="FIRST">
	<return-type type="void"/>
	<parameters>
		<parameter name="button" type="GtkButton*"/>
	</parameters>
</signal>

Note the future format .gir (in vala 0.3.4) :

      <callback name="clicked">
        <return-value>
          <type name="none" c:type="void"/>
        </return-value>
        <parameters>
          <parameter name="button">
            <type name="GtkButton*" c:type="GtkButton*"/>
          </parameter>
        </parameters>
      </callback>


2008/6/26 Sam Liddicott <sam liddicott com>:
> * gege2061 wrote, On 26/06/08 13:03:
>
> Good :)
>
> But it's not a simple feature :(
>
> You can use the files (created by gobject introspection) instead
> create a vapi-xml convertor. But is it a good idea to add dependancies
> with this files (which aren't installed with vala, unlike the vapi
> files)?
>
>
> I haven't found any instructions on vala introspection yet. Do you have any?
>
> Sam
>
> 2008/6/25 Sam Liddicott <sam liddicott com>:
>
>
> Thanks; silly me, it's obvious now.
>
> It makes perfect sense.
>
> I'm thinking about the prototype problem.
> I guess the vapi files know, so it will involve libvala no doubt.
>
> It will either be a vapi-xml convertor or rewrite the xslt to vala or C
> using libvala.
>
> Sam
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gege2061 <gege2061 redaction-developpez com>
> Sent: 25 June 2008 20:38
> To: Sam Liddicott <sam liddicott com>
> Cc: vala-list gnome org
> Subject: Re: gtk widget bindings complete
>
> Complete GladeValaDemo class with :
>
> public abstract void on_button1_clicked(Gtk.Widget widget);
> public abstract void on_GladeValaDemo_destroy (Gtk.Widget widget);
>
> The problem is to determine the prototype of callback :/
>
> 2008/6/25 Sam Liddicott <sam liddicott com>:
>
>
> I fear I don't understand the second suggestion. Please could you provide a
> small example.
>
> Thanks
>
> Sam
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gege2061 <gege2061 redaction-developpez com>
> Sent: 25 June 2008 18:39
> To: Sam Liddicott <sam liddicott com>
> Cc: vala-list gnome org
> Subject: Re: gtk widget bindings complete
>
>
>
> After analyzing the generated code, I have some proposals :
>   * Use abstract class,
>
>
> you're probably right. It's just sugar, but sugar is important.
>
>
> Of course, it's just a proposal, for v2...
>
>
>
>   * Create abstrat method for signal,
>
>
> I considered this. I'm not certain of the benefits.
> There are lots of signals, most of which exist of exist for each widget.
>
> Often there is a different signal handler for the same signal for different
> widgets.
>
> So what would these abstract methods be? Dispatchers? Based on what info?
>
> Only the developer knows what signals he wants to catch and how, so I left
> these to be done in the subclass, but at least the developer only has to get
> the name right and the rest happens automatically.
>
>
> Sorry I wanted to say : signal callback, defined in XML, to force
> developers to implement it in sub-classe (hence my first proposal).
>
>
>
>   * Use verbatim string for XML (see my example).
>
>
> I don't like this because the xml may actually contain """ and there is no
> way to escape it.
> I did have it set to close the string on \n and start a new line and open
> the string again, but vala doesn't support const string concatenation yet
>
>
> --
> Nicolas Joseph
>
> Responsable de la rubrique GTK+ de developpez.com /
> In charge of the GTK+ section on developpez.com
>
> http://nicolasj.developpez.com
>
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
Nicolas Joseph

Responsable de la rubrique GTK+ de developpez.com /
In charge of the GTK+ section on developpez.com

http://nicolasj.developpez.com