Re: [Vala] """Verbatim strings""" vs. "string" "literal" "concatenation"

[Frederik <scumm_fredo gmx net>]

Jürg Billeter wrote:
> This won't cause any issues. Three consecutive " are considered a single
> token and will never be interpreted as an empty string followed by
> another string. We should certainly add string literal concatenation,
> it's just not implemented yet.

That's great news.

Thanks

@Yu Feng: Verbatim strings don't process any escape sequences and may 
span multiple lines.