[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Vala] RE : array of function pointer
- From: PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel picca synchrotron-soleil fr>
- To: Matías De la Puente <mfpuente ar gmail com>
- Cc: vala-list gnome org
- Subject: [Vala] RE : array of function pointer
- Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:49:31 +0200
> Great!! I think i was the only one..
Thanks for the work you have done with GSL.
I found 2 errors in the current .vapi. I will send you a patch in a next email,
don't you think that this vapi file can be part of the officisl GSL repository. (the git one) ?
> In the binding I have to create a delegate because is the only way that vala
> point to a function.
> MultirootF was the only name that occurred me to use. The importat think is
> the parameters (Vector, void*, Vector ) and the returned type (int)...
good name :).
the problem with vala is that you can not declare a parameter as a constant.
so you have warnings during the C colpilation.
the real C signature is (const gsl_vector*, void*, gsl_vector*)
> I Think vala do not handle array of delegate, see
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=521688
so we need to waite a little longer :)
> I Think in the near future a static delegate will desappear, see
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=526549
> I still don't know how will be implemented the static delegates, but i will
> change the gsl vapi file with the proper code...
Good luke.
> You are welcome, any opinion is welcome
I am using the multiroot minimization and root finding so if I find something wrong, I will send a patch.
> PS: you are f7 in the irc?
No sorry :)
which irc canal is it ?
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]