[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[no subject]
This definition is preventing me from passing some data to my IOFunc from
add_watch. Is there a way to do this?
Shouldn't add_watch and IOFunc have an additional "..." parameter?
Regards
Sudharshan S
------=_Part_20023_24088329.1218021255592
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
<div dir="ltr">Hi everyone,<br>I am having a peculiar problem. In python, we add a watch using gobject.io_add_watch (..., ..., self.callbackFunc)<br>and the callback would be defined as follows<br>def callbackFunc (*self*, ..., ....):<br>
<br>The IOFunc? callback takes a reference to the current object as part of its arguments. But its not the same with the IOFunc definition in vala<br><br>From glib-2.0.vapi,<br>public delegate bool IOFunc (IOChannel source, IOCondition condition);<br>
public uint add_watch (IOCondition condition, IOFunc func);<br><br>This definition is preventing me from passing some data to my IOFunc from add_watch. Is there a way to do this?<br>Shouldn't add_watch and IOFunc have an additional "..." parameter?<br>
<br>Regards<br>Sudharshan S<br><br><br></div>
------=_Part_20023_24088329.1218021255592--
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]