On Feb 25, 2007, at 11:15 PM, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
... How could indication of secondary (or higher) sorting be unnecessary without it also being unnecessary for primary sorting, since you can determine the sorting from the results? ...
That's an interesting question. I think the answer is probably that people care about sorting by one column much more often than they care about sorting by two or more.
Cheers -- Matthew Paul Thomas http://mpt.net.nz/