Re: [Tracker] tracker 1.2.4



On 06/11/14 11:12, mlo wrote:
Am 06.11.2014 um 11:36 schrieb Martyn Russell:

Hallo Martin,

Tracker uses W3C standards for RDF ontologies using Nepomuk with
SPARQL to query and update the data.

Thanks Martyn for that bit of information!
I just learned from it, that Nepomuk is a common ground in KDE and GNOME.
Am I right?

That depends a bit.

How close is the relation?

Tracker technically uses Nepomuk + extensions to fill the gaps we need filling, so yes it does use the standard, but not the library or source works from the KDE folks.

From what I've heard lately, KDE is moving away from Nepomuk, so it was common but perhaps not now?

As for libnepomuk*, I have no idea, but we're not using it.

Is there a chance of, e.g., dolphin using the same RDF-store as tracker?

Well, tracker is an RDF store. Perhaps you mean "using the Tracker RDF store" ?

Would I break tracker if I tried it out?

Try away, but it's unclear to me what you think you would be breaking here. If you have indexed content in Tracker and you change the ontologies installed in to /usr/share/tracker/ontologies/ then the next restart of tracker-store might spit errors out at you ;)

In the worst case, you can just tracker-control -r (to reindex) after fixing your changes. There are also ontology validation scripts/tools in the Tracker code base (see utils/ontology/).

I just browsed through the Nepomuk and semanticdesktop.org sites. There
is a lot of good ideas and promising tools.
The "DropBox" for one; I'd really like to try that one.

What do you think?

I've not looked into it personally.

btw.: I used to do some research in a semantic-web project (called SWAP
- you can still find it online - http://www.aifb.kit.edu/web/SWAP) years
ago myself ...

What's your aim here, may I ask?

--
Regards,
Martyn

Founder & Director @ Lanedo GmbH.
http://www.linkedin.com/in/martynrussell


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]