Le mercredi 04 juillet 2007 à 02:24 -0700, Brian Davis a écrit : > On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 02:13:44 -0700 > Brian Davis <brian william davis gmail com> wrote: > > > Jamie, it's great to have you back. Things picked up in my life as > > well and Hum development stagnated a bit. I was cleaning up some bugs > > when I realized that the metadata issue I was whining about never > > seemed to go away for me. Any calls I make to "tracker_metadata_get()" > > return pointers to empty arrays. > > > > I'd love to find out that I'm misusing the API, but the trackerd logs > > appear to be properly extracting and returning the correct metadata. > > > > You had mentioned a few months ago that this was a known issue. Is > > there a fix in the pipeline? > > Check that, I am getting file size metadata... but nothing else. I see the same thing here. I tried a RDF query to find musics from 80's and did not find anything, but wallpapers are ok (so height and width are handled)... "Audio:RealeaseDate" was ignored. Some infos are missing in Tracker-search-tool too. I looked into database and some metadatas seem to be stored but are they stored correctly? And are some data missing? For samplerate of a MP3 : ID , ServiceID, MetaDataID, MetaDataValue, MetaDataDisplay 286361, 70798 , 51 , , 44100 286361, 70768 , 51 , , 44100 Why two different IDs for the same data? Same thing for bitrate. I do not see releaseDate or informations about performers of a song for instance. I used this tool to look into database data: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=87946 Any idea about what is going wrong? Laurent. > _______________________________________________ > tracker-list mailing list > tracker-list gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=