Re: [Tracker] trackerd consumes over 6 MB of RAM

["Tshepang Lekhonkhobe" <tshepang gmail com>]

On 11/16/06, Jamie McCracken <jamiemcc blueyonder co uk> wrote:
> Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> > Tracker, currently indexing, consumes 18 MB of RAM, so you should
> > probably remove the 3-6 MB consumption advertisement. It currently
> > indexes about 200GB  of data of about 52,000 files.
> >
> > here's the output of du .Tracker/
> > 1880    .Tracker/databases/Files/0001
> > 1892    .Tracker/databases/Files/0002
> > 1916    .Tracker/databases/Files/0003
> > 1896    .Tracker/databases/Files/0004
> > 7592    .Tracker/databases/Files
> > 56712   .Tracker/databases
> > 69992   .Tracker/
>
> this is another area we really beat Beagle too and a lot of other
> indexers  - disk usage.
>
> less than 70MB including full text for 200GB is excellent!

Like I mentioned, I'm not done indexing, due to the problem of
tracker-extract being stuck on video (DVD backup vob files done with
dvdbackup). A workaround was moving the files away from my home
directory. I'll post du's output once trackerd is done.