El mié, 17-01-2007 a las 11:33 +0100, Vincent Untz escribió:
> We discussed about this with Alex in the past. The main reason that we
> have two modules is that I know some people were using pessulus only and
> really didn't need sabayon.
>
> We can of course have sabayon depend on the system installation of
> pessulus. Another solution could be to have the sabayon module provide
> the two tools: sabayon with included pessulus, and standalone pessulus.
>
> I don't care that much about the way we solve this, but it's quite
> important, IMHO, that we keep a standalone pessulus.
OK :)
<embrace-and-extend>
What do we need to move Pessulus into the Sabayon source tree for good,
and yet be able to run Pessulus standalone?
</embrace-and-extend>