Re: rpm-ostree vs comps

[Micah Abbott <miabbott redhat com>]

On 04/06/2016 06:48 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Another rpm-ostree question:
>
> I've spent some time syncing the package list of the Fedora
> workstation ostree image with the traditional live image. One ends up
> with a ginormous package list (see
> https://pagure.io/atomic-workstation-config/blob/master/f/fedora-atomic-workstation-default.json
> )
> which will be a pain to keep in sync with the package set on the live
> image, which is specified via comps groups.
>
> Have you considered allowing comps groups as input for the tree compose ?

There is a blurb here about comps, under the 'packages' item:

https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/blob/master/docs/manual/treefile.md


> I guess one answer could be that with soft dependencies, we can
> replace comps groups with metapackages and Suggests. But we don't have
> that currently...
> _______________________________________________
> ostree-list mailing list
> ostree-list gnome org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ostree-list