Re: [orca-list] More Recent Orca debs?

[luke Davis <speakup lists tacticus com>]

I figured I would have to upgrade at-spi, but didn't realize that would force me 
up to Gnome 3.

My hope was to upgrade as little as possible for now--just what was necessary to 
bring Orca more current, hopefully staying with Gnome2.

I don't really mind upgrading to unstable, although I'd prefer not to go up to 
testing, since this is a production laptop.

Is Gnome-shell 3.2 particularly less accessible than Gnome 2.X?

Luke


On Sat, 21 Apr 2012, Jason White wrote:

> luke Davis <speakup lists tacticus com> wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > Are there pre-packaged versions of Orca for Debian, that are
> > maintained outside of stable?
>
> Yes, in the unstable and testing repositories. As a practical matter, you
> would be best to upgrade your entire system, since the latest Orca also
> depends on AT-SPI 2.
>
> Gnome-Shell 3.2 isn't very accessible; 3.4 is better, but it hasn't been
> uploaded to Debian yet. The developers are working through a complicated
> process of upgrading the dependencies so they can move to gnome 3.4.
>
> So, if you're willing to deal with Gnome 3.x and the latest of everything, by
> all means configure testing or unstable as your primary repository and
> upgrade.
>
> _______________________________________________
> orca-list mailing list
> orca-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
> Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca.
> The manual is at http://library.gnome.org/users/gnome-access-guide/nightly/ats-2.html
> The FAQ is at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
> Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org
> Find out how to help at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/HowCanIHelp