Re: [orca-list] More structural navigation thoughts



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi
Ok, that makes sense. Calling it "move to last spoken live region" or
something like that would clear it up I think.
Should it really have a letter key of its own though, or should we bind
it to whatever live region key we end up using with a modifier such as
alt? If not, my other suggestion would be to move it to the ` (accent)
key, to match some of the other screen readers in Windows, since making
it simpler for the newcomer is the main goal. It would free up a letter
key for another use that we'll no doubt need at some point.
What do you think?

On 04/28/2010 01:07 AM, Joanmarie Diggs wrote:
Hi Jacob.

Given that we're binding the structural navigation shortcut keys, I have
a question about one I've been curious over. What does the "go to last
live region" key, y, do exactly?

To be honest, I had to go back and check because I was not involved with
that implementation.

According to the associated bug/rfe: [1]

My conversation with Mike yielded three good ideas that I will now try to
implement.

1) A user command to hear one of up to 6 previous messages from a given live
region.

2) Implement Will's idea of moving to the live region which was just announced.

3) Change output so that rude messages don't interrupt any other utterances.

So y is intended to move to the last live region spoken. Which makes
sense to me as a feature. It also suggests that the keybinding
description is missing a word. Three comments later in the bug, Will
made a similar observation:

In the way they are used here, "previous" and "next" refer to
navigational location on the page, which makes sense.  The word "last" threw
me, however, and I went looking for "previous".  I then realized "last" was in
the temporal sense of the word.  So, when I look at this help text for the
user:

+                _("Goes to previous live region."))
+                _("Goes to next live region."))
+                _("Goes to last live region."))

I wonder if a different word choice can be made for "last" (e.g., "current")?
Or, do we just need to live with the fact that we are dealing with words that
can describe both relative aspects of time and location?

But nothing seems to have taken place in response. <shrugs>

If I tack on the word 'spoken' to the end of the description string, do
you think that would make things sufficiently clear? Would 'current' be
better?

--joanie

[1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=466251#c33


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkvX4xgACgkQybLrVJs+Wi4h/gCfUtE3dAKLdjo74DU37CIlGY06
/e8An3sii3J+QkMWCultA8IWO+XvbA3J
=+wxg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]