Re: [orca-list] buffering

[Hermann <meinelisten onlinehome de>]

On 30.03.2009 at 20:27:59 Krishnakant <hackingkk gmail com> wrote:

> I would just like to add one important tip.
>
> While certain seasoned practices sound very stable and have the tag of
> being "well tested and experienced ", we must always welcome ideas which
> sound better  but go against that long tradition.
> Orca, we all know gets feedback from the best brains which any talking
> software can really get.
> This implies that the most stupid and the smartest person has equal say.

Persons like me?

> Some times it happens that a so called stupid is not really so and her/
> his idea may have not even clicked to we smart hackers and that's where
> different approaches to solve the problem at hand comes up.
>
Oh, I'm very grateful to be understood by a "smart hacker", even if that
happens only "sometimes".

> I don't want to go in the debait of wether buffered approach is better
> or non-buffered approach, but what ever the orca team decided has
> yielded great results and I believe it also directly reflects on how
> well a web page is designed with accessibility in mind.
>
What would you say, if that Orca team changes their minds?

> I can just say that wili and the rest of the team has been as best as
> they could be and the decisions on the approaches have not been just the
> decisions of the "orca development team ", but the entire community
> excluding some few exceptions.
>
I got the mmessage. But as always: The majority is silent, and the
"prophets" think it is on their side.

>
> happy hacking.
> Krishnakant.
>
BTW: Do you know what "hacking" means in Germany? To break into other
peoples computer in order to steal data, such as passwords, bank account
data etc.
Hermann