[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [orca-list] buffering



> >  I was in discussion with
> > a couple of people from another mailing list, had to use jaws for a day,
> > (and hated it), ...
> 
> Why?

It has a crappy review screen feature, bad keymaps, and all inclosed
rubbish... 
And some other features I didn't particularly like, but this is not the
list for that discussion: why make your own custom scripting language?
That's beyond me.

> I didn't read all mails, but I think the first one is a good statement.
> My impression in the discussions we had before was often that people
> judge very much from their ideological commitments, rather than from their
> experience (in fact there were not too much regarding Windows).
> But to make a long story short: I doubt that we will ever have such a
> feature like buffering, since the majority of the list member, and above
> all the Orca team, rejects completely this idea.

I completely agree, if it's not necessary don't add it. As others have
said it will cause problems with pages that update live...

Daniel

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]