[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [orca-list] Compiling Gnome
- From: Steve Holmes <steve holmesgrown com>
- To: Orca E-mail List <orca-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [orca-list] Compiling Gnome
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:17:50 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
Well, that's another twist:). Actually from what I had previously
gathered, I always thought at-spi had depended on atk for low level
stuff but what do I know? I never was sure where gail fit in the
loop. I really wish these README files the developers assemble would
show the proper list of dependencies. Frankly, the at-spi files are
worse. the README says nothing about compilation order and the
INSTALL file is too generic to offer any real substance.
I guess the config files are a good definitive source as any though;
especially since they drive what gets compiled and when.
One thing we can probally all agree on is that Orca should be compiled
last. <smile>
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 08:16:58AM -0500, Willie Walker wrote:
> Steve:
>
> Oh dear. I think I've had the wrong mental model of all of this and now
> I'm very confused. I scouring the configure.in files for atk, gail, and
> at-spi, I think I'm seeing the following order:
>
> at-spi depends upon gail depends upon atk
>
> Will
>
> Steve Holmes wrote:
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >Hash: RIPEMD160
> >
> >This is where the conflict begins. I'm hearing two conflicting orders
> >here. Last week, I had a mess of my system because things were
> >somehow compiled/built in the wrong order or something; I had all
> >kinds of problems with Orca. I followed once sequence later on and
> >managed to get things right and the gnome and orca worked fine. I
> >then heard Willie's suggested order so rebuilt the stuff along with
> >the updates from svn and things still work OK but there must be a
> >defined order hear due to the dependencies in place. I think the only
> >time it wouldn't matter much is if they were all stand-alone packages
> >using shared libraries loaded dynamically. But if any of them use
> >stuff from another installed package that's already installed, then
> >this order is important. I originally thought the order was more like
> >yours specified here but am not really sure now. The README files
> >don't mention these packages specifically so it is not obvious.
> >
> >On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 07:35:31AM +0100, Bohdan R. Rau wrote:
> >>Dnia 28-01-2008, pon o godzinie 08:45 -0500, Willie Walker pisze:
> >>[...]
> >>>1) The AT-SPI defines the overall API and provides the overall support
> >>>for the infrastructure, so at-spi need to be built first.
> >>
> >>>From at-spi.spec (old 1.20 version):
> >>
> >>BuildRequires: atk-devel >= 1:1.20.0
> >>BuildRequires: gail-devel >= 1.20.0
> >>
> >>So I think at-spi should be built after gail and atk.
> >>
> >>Bohdan
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Orca-list mailing list
> >>Orca-list gnome org
> >>http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
> >>Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca
> >
> >- --
> >HolmesGrown Solutions
> >The best solutions for the best price!
> >http://holmesgrown.ld.net/
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
> >
> >iD8DBQFHobnHWSjv55S0LfERAypTAJ4tF4+TxfY52BiITBwc4nk4KAsJkwCgtR37
> >qYaDU2ccQpb0Quiu1Wc0+t8=
> >=insc
> >-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >_______________________________________________
> >Orca-list mailing list
> >Orca-list gnome org
> >http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
> >Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca
>
- --
HolmesGrown Solutions
The best solutions for the best price!
http://holmesgrown.ld.net/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHofSuWSjv55S0LfERAwZdAJ9m316jKasuFp71841Dux0B6WrlUgCbBzo8
mhtYJlv1kVKmbecL8/OwTuw=
=m7Mb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]