[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [orca-list] Compiling Gnome



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

That is the correct procedure I outlined.  No, that won't update the
rest of gnome as there was something like 230 separate binary packages
in Dropline gnome which I installed on my Slackware 12 system.  Can't
say about Debian.  But if I had to update all 230 packages every time
I wanted to update Orca, I'd quit!:)

I think these four are all that's necessary to update to get the
latest accessibility stuff.  I'm basing this partly on some previous
messages  I've read on the list here.Again, I don't know about Debian
but these binary supplements for Slackware such as Dropline or Slacky
don't have a Gnome 2.22 out yet.

On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 10:17:12AM +0100, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
> Dear Steve,
> 
> Many, many thanks for your reply. It will definitely be helpful.
> 
> > The best way to get there would be to go to 
> > http://live.gnome.org/Orca/Firefox
> 
> Thanks. I already followed the instructions on the DownloadInstall page
> of Orca's wiki.
> So the question is more like: which components of gnome should be
> recompiled rom sources ?
> 
> > and read down to the links that discuss updating Orca.  This
> > documentation stresses the importance of updating at-spi and Orca with
> > svn (subversion) but once going through there, you will soon realize
> > you need to update atk as well.  I've seen on list here that gail is
> > kept to current svn levels too.
> >  
> > So in summary, you would svn gail from gnome's svn, build it, install
> > it and then proceed to atk and do the same.  After that, build and
> > install at-spi per the directions given at the Orca wiki and finally
> > Orca itself.
> 
> Okay so you recommend a four-steps procedure which consists in
> compiling/installing
> 1. gail
> 2. atk
> 3. at-spi
> 4. orca
> 
> Is it correct that this procedure _won't_ update the whole gnome desktop
> from the debian-packaged version 2.20 to the development version 2.22 ?
> My understanding was that that it's really important to update the whole
> gnome desktop. Is that true or will the previous procedure be enough ?
> 
> Thanks for helping,
> Sébastien.
> _______________________________________________
> Orca-list mailing list
> Orca-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
> Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca

- -- 
HolmesGrown Solutions
The best solutions for the best price!
http://holmesgrown.ld.net/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHneepWSjv55S0LfERA0Y4AJ4gPDIHSsQI0UkCHdwXBeVBy9FymgCgviS3
dXd4j3F3qZklD2GBy6XYv4k=
=9nXm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]