Re: libgnome dependencies

[Jani Monoses <jani monoses gmail com>]

Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 17:13 +0200, Jani Monoses wrote:
> > This patch contained the removal of the last libgnome bits
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460671
> >
> > until the recent move of vpn-properties code from the NetworkManager module
> > made those not 'the last' :)
> >
> > The vpn code uses GnomeDruid which is replaceable by GtkAssistant (GTK >=2.10).
> >
> > Should that be done with ifdef on GTK 2.10 or can it be safely assumed that
> > 0.7 will be used on systems and distros with 2.10 (which is over one year old)
> > and just remove GnomeDruid code?
>
> Probably not, we'll have to #ifdef some stuff.  I'd like to keep compat
> with at least 2.8 and possibly 2.6.  Anything < 2.6 is fair game to kill
> though.

Ok. Filed a patch which keeps the GnomeDruid code as well.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470554

Gtk+ <2.6 was removed a while ago from n-m.

Jani