On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Yes, I read that comment. However I'm not prepared to start breaking the functionality of shells that I never use.This is a rather strange statement. As a developer you should try to go beyond your personal preferences. Changes to the subshell shall be tested with all supported shells and on as many platforms as possible.From Chet Ramey's statement it is clear that using printf is the rightthing to do.
That's his statement. Jim Meyering's comment is more reasonable. (bash 3.2 is broken anyway - perhaps 3.3 will be usable). -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net