Re: gtkmm-list Digest, Vol 46, Issue 2

["Onur Tugcu" <onur tugcu gmail com>]

I've noticed several "Error" parameters missing in function
declaration documentation, just my two cents.

On Feb 2, 2008 2:00 PM,  <gtkmm-list-request gnome org> wrote:
> Send gtkmm-list mailing list submissions to
>         gtkmm-list gnome org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         gtkmm-list-request gnome org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         gtkmm-list-owner gnome org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of gtkmm-list digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: giomm API review needed (Murray Cumming)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2008 02:28:47 +0100
> From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
> Subject: Re: giomm API review needed
> To: gtkmm-list <gtkmm-list gnome org>
> Message-ID: <1201915727 6198 7 camel murrayc-desktop>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
>
> On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 01:06 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 17:58 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > > giomm is now in glibmm. But we need more people to take a look and
> > > review the API. We'll have to freeze the API quite soon for GNOME 2.22,
> > > though I'm not sure exactly when that will be for glib and glibmm.
> > >
> > > I am gradually adding documentation, but I'm only up to
> > > Gio::FileEnumerator so far, alphabetically:
> > > http://www.gtkmm.org/docs/glibmm-2.4/docs/reference/html/namespaceGio.html
> > >
> > > Gio::File is probably a good place to start, though I don't yet have a
> > > good idea of the API as a whole:
> > > http://www.gtkmm.org/docs/glibmm-2.4/docs/reference/html/classGio_1_1File.html#_details
> >
> > We are getting close to an API freeze for giomm, but I really want more
> > people to test it and review the API. You'll have only yourselves to
> > blame if you only discover the problems later.
>
> We still need to wrap the vfuncs for all the objects (or check that the
> object has no vfuncs), which involves hand-writing the .defs for the
> vfuncs. Any help with that would be appreciated.
>
> --
> murrayc murrayc com
> www.murrayc.com
> www.openismus.com
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> gtkmm-list mailing list
> gtkmm-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
>
>
> End of gtkmm-list Digest, Vol 46, Issue 2
> *****************************************
>