Re: TreeModelFilter modify func

[Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch gmx de>]

muppet wrote:

> Hrm.  Yeah, that looks suspect.  We pass in the value, but don't  
> marshal it back.  So, while changing the behavior at this point could  
> be considered an API break, nobody could really be using this  
> successfully at present.
> 
> The patch looks okay, and it's only the API stability issues that  
> worry me.

I don't think there's a way someone could have used this successfully,
either.

We could put the patch into an unstable release first.

-- 
Bye,
-Torsten