Re: Atom constants

[Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch gmx de>]

Kevin Ryde wrote:
> Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch gmx de> writes:
>> Is this a good idea?
> 
> If it was mine I'd leave it as is.  The class func style is fairly
> reasonable, it doesn't seem so terrible as to ask everyone to change
> their code.  (Gotta save that for when something big turns out to be
> unworkable! :-)
> 
> Or as a justification it may even save a couple of bytes not to create
> atom objects for constsubs which will be rarely used.

OK, convinced.

-- 
Bye,
-Torsten