Re: TreeDragSource data_get location

[Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch gmx de>]

Kevin Ryde wrote:
> Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch gmx de> writes:
>> It's not obvious to me what the default for the target should be.  You chose
>> the atom for GTK_TREE_MODEL_ROW -- why?
> 
> With an eye on gtk_tree_set_row_drag_data() which looks like it refuses
> to act on a selection data of any other target value.  Makes you wonder
> if it ought to allow NULL or NONE or whatever at least ... (a matter for
> gtk of course).

OK, when you add

	new_selection_data.length = -1;

to the "else" branch, the patch looks good to me.

muppet?

-- 
Bye,
-Torsten