[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Subclasses, tied hashes, {get,set}_property, undefined values
- From: Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch gmx de>
- To: gtk-perl-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Subclasses, tied hashes, {get,set}_property, undefined values
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 21:30:36 +0100
On Sun, 2007-11-18 at 15:13 -0500, muppet wrote:
> > So, does this make sense? Is the benchmark sound, or are there cases
> > which are slowed down measurably by this patch? Is the
> > name gperl_sv_defined good, or are there better alternatives?
>
> Sounds like a good idea to me. I'm sure Gtk2 and friends contain lots
> more places where this would be necessary... I'm not really concerned
> by how much this might slow things down, because any performance gain
> we were getting was based on not doing everything we should've been
> doing.
Alright, committed. I'll fix Gtk2 soon.
--
Bye,
-Torsten
- References:
- Subclasses, tied hashes, {get,set}_property, undefined values
- Re: Subclasses, tied hashes, {get,set}_property, undefined values
- Re: Subclasses, tied hashes, {get,set}_property, undefined values
- Re: Subclasses, tied hashes, {get,set}_property, undefined values
- Re: Subclasses, tied hashes, {get,set}_property, undefined values
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]