Re: Gtk2: defaults for widget constructors

[goran kirra net]

I think it is a good idea to add defaults where it
feels like a naural extension from logical or historical
reasons. Go ahead.

/göran


On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 10:31:15PM +0100, Jörn Reder wrote:
> "John McDermott" wrote:
> 
> > First, anything to make porting gtk apps to gtk2 easier would be a big help.
> 
> My opinion ;)
> 
> > One way to implement the "old" defaults might be to allow the user to 
> > call a method or set a flag of some sort to enable the old defaults.  Of 
> > course, if everyone wants the old defaults then this is not necessary.
> 
> After looking at the code, I don't think that such a compatability flag
> is really necessary. Only a few widgets are affected: (extracted from 
> the Perl/Gtk1 sources)
> 
>   * GtkArrow.xs:new(Class, arrow_type=GTK_ARROW_RIGHT, shadow_type=GTK_SHADOW_OUT)
>   * GtkAspectFrame.xs:new(Class, label, xalign=0.5, yalign=0.5, ratio=1.0, obey_child=TRUE)
>   * GtkAlignment.xs:new(Class, xalign=0.5, yalign=0.5, xscale=1.0, yscale=1.0)
>   * GtkHBox.xs:new(Class, homogeneous=FALSE, spacing=5)
>   * GtkToolbar.xs:new(Class, orientation=GTK_ORIENTATION_HORIZONTAL, style=GTK_TOOLBAR_BOTH)
>   * GtkVBox.xs:new(Class, homogeneous=FALSE, spacing=5)
>   * GtkTable.xs:new(Class, rows, cols, homogeneous=FALSE)
> 
> and the defaults are reasonably. So I just added them and commited it to
> CVS. If we decide, a compatability flag or something like that should 
> activate them, this can still be added to the code.
> 
> (and I really like it to write just Gtk2::VBox->new ;)
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Joern