On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 02:43:29PM -0400, Ross McFarland wrote: > > after looking at gtkspell.c for gtk2. i could do mappings for it in less than > an hour so to be honest i probably will this weekend. i see general usefulness > in having them. they will probably be part of the Gtk2-perl-xs tree and be > built if the nec stuff (gtkspell.c, ...) is on the system. > > sorry that doesn't answer your point, or provide much usefullness to your > project. Actually this is great to hear. Eventually we'll move to Gtk2 bindings so having gtkspell 2.x there already about be goodness. > looking at the gtkspell 1.x stuff it's not going to be quite as > straightforward, but it you could provide mappings for it in gtk-perl. this of > course would still leave you with the dependacy of having to install > gtkspell.c 1.x which you said you'd rather avoid. i have no desire to look at > getting it into gtk-perl. for that matter it seems that there's no longer > (like for the past 2 years) any development work being put into gtk-perl. Yup, I feel the same way. It's relatively straight forward code and should be an easy rewrite in perl for use with Gtk-Perl. However, being a system admin by nature my first thought was to see if anyone had done it before me, being lazy and all. :) -- Scott Russell <lnxgeek us ibm com> IBM Linux Technology Center, System Admin
Attachment:
pgp0XNKaQp8hJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature