Maciej Piechotka escribió:
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 22:49 +0100, Martin (OPENGeoMap) wrote:Maciej Piechotka escribió:On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 22:30 +0100, Martin (OPENGeoMap) wrote:hi:I was talking about a full utf16 and utf8 api in glib and use a macro to work work intermediate string:Well - what do you mean? Having 2 functions - one reciving utf-16 and one utf-8? To be honest - it doesn't make any sense to me (it would create much mess, double the code, make programming errors easier...). Converting? What's wrong with g_utf16_to_utf8?For example in windows they have this types: LPSTR =char *char * is used for utf-8 AFAIRLPWSTR= utf16windowschar *gunichar2perhaps in glib we could have utf16 and utf8 in that way or am i wrong?I'm not glib developer. As far as the module of operating on utf-16 strings is proposed I'm not against. However I would prefere to not have 2 entries to each function.Hi: What is wrong with: gchar* g_utf8_strncpy (gchar *dest,const gchar *src,gsize n);That's one not needed as strncpy should work.
hehe i know but that function it really exist: http://library.gnome.org/devel/glib/unstable/glib-Unicode-Manipulation.html#g-utf8-strncpy
gunichar2 * g_utf16_strncpy (gunichar2*dest,const gunichar2*src,gsize n);That's kind of support I'm not against.and the macro: gtext* g_text_strncpy (gtext*dest,const gtext*src,gsize n); regards.With the entries - nothing. With macro - it may be just me but I percive it shooting into foot. Just imagine that some header will assume gtext to be utf-8. Other will turn on the macro (or user code) and change it to utf-16. IMHO - having magic switch which might change the ABI is not good.Regards