Re: turning g_assert* into warnings

[Yevgen Muntyan <muntyan tamu edu>]

BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
> On 10/12/07, Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi gmail com> wrote:
>   
> > On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 14:40 +0200, Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
> >
> >     
> > > So I guess what you really want is some kind of "g_soft_assert" or some
> > > "g_warn_if_fail".
> > >       
> > +1 on a g_warn_if_fail() API addition.
> >     
>
> What is wrong with:
>
> if (!everything_is_ok)
>     g_warning ("blaha");
>
> ? Those double or triple negatives that the *_if_fail routines
> introduce always confuses me: g_return_if_fail (!(flag != SOMETHING &&
> x)); ugh..
>   

You messed it up somehow. It's never triple, since our normal logic
is either "yes" or "no", the max is double negative which is positive.
Your example would be some
g_warn_if_fail (everything_is_ok, "blaha");
nothing fancy.