Re: Moving maemo-gtk as gtk+ branch?

[Xan <xan lopez gmail com>]

On 6/2/07, Matthias Clasen <matthias clasen gmail com> wrote:
> On 6/1/07, Tommi Komulainen <tommi komulainen nokia com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As there's growing interest for Hildon outside the maemo context we're
> > currently discussing moving Hildon to gnome.org infrastructure to give
> > it more independent status. The plan is to ensure that Hildon can be
> > used with stock gtk+, though with somewhat limited capabilities.
> >
> > However we'll still need to maintain our branch of gtk+ for the time
> > being and with Hildon moving to gnome.org it would be somewhat awkward
> > to have the gtk+ branch elsewhere.
> >
> > Now my question is, do you think it would make sense to move maemo gtk+
> > to a gtk+ branch, or would you prefer us maintaining it elsewhere?
>
> I don't see any particular problem with a maemo branch. If the
> longterm goal is to reduce the delta down to zero, it might be good if
> there was an uptodate list of the remaining differences and their
> merge status. Maybe that already exists somewhere in the maemo wiki
> and I am not aware of it...

http://live.gnome.org/Maemo/Gtk210Changes has all the gory details of
the delta against upstream. The longterm goal is to reduce the
difference as much as possible yes (and we did great progress in the
last few months).

Cheers, Xan

> _______________________________________________
> gtk-devel-list mailing list
> gtk-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list