Re: Fwd: gtk+ API change; who should fix it? (A.k.a. Why isn't GNOME 2.19.4 released yet?)

[Tim Janik <timj gtk org>]

On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Elijah Newren wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Sorry to be a pest, but I noticed gtk+-2.11.5 was out, and was
> surprised to not see the tips_data_list vs. _tips_data_list issue
> reverted.  So...
>
> On 6/25/07, Elijah Newren <newren gmail com> wrote:
> > On 6/22/07, Matthias Clasen <matthias clasen gmail com> wrote:
> > > Thats fine. Can we still please revert the field name change to make 
> > existing
> > > pygtk versions compile against 2.11.x ?
> >
> > And is there any chance we could get a new tarball so we can release
> > GNOME 2.19.4?
>
> Is this in the plans any time soon, or was the reversion decided against?

i've made a new suggestion about the rename to deal with the fallout of the
field rename on the relevant bug and haven't seen a specific reply to that yet:

  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447214#c16

i apprechiate further comments...

> [Yes, I know I need to also pester the pygtk folks some more to get a
> new pygtk tarball as well.]

> Thanks for all your hard work,
> Elijah

---
ciaoTJ