[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Profiling GTK within an application
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: Chris Rorvick <chrisr trdlnk com>
- Cc: gtk-app-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Profiling GTK within an application
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:02:21 +0100
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 12:47 -0500, Chris Rorvick wrote:
> Stefan Kost wrote:
> > This is most likely caused by cairo. You should also see a bit less
> > CPU usage in 2.12 compared to 2.10 (or more precise newer cairo should
> > perform a bit better).
>
> For some reason, this happens to be one of two libraries that I'm
> statically linking in. I wasn't seeing a lot of time spent in it when
> looking at the gprof report.
>
> > I would suggest to use a sampling profiler, like oprofile, sysprof,
> > but all those are linux profilers (they need a kernel module). But I
> > am sure there a sampling profilers for solaris too. The advantage is
> > that you don't need to recompile your apps (given you have debug
> > symbols alreday) and it works with shared libs too.
>
> I figured out that Sun's dtrace tool allows me to basically script a
> sampling profiler just as you describe. Very cool program. My program
> is spending more than 50% of its userland time executing code in glib,
> and a vast majority of that is split evenly between two functions:
> g_slist_find() and g_slist_remove_all().
>
> I'm going to have to do some more work to figure out the context in
> which these functions are being invoked, but I'm making progress! :)
If it's only processor-bounds stuff (rather than io-bound) like this
that you are worried about, kcachegrind is a wonderful way to discover
this.
--
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]