Re: signals to 2 objects - it's worse

[walter tallent <w41t3r yahoo com>]

As I said, I'm learning as I go, and this issue has
exposed a major design flaw in my program.  So I have
to solve that problem, and then I think this issue
will  no longer exist.
So... thanks for the responses!
walter

--- Tristan Van Berkom <vantr touchtunes com> wrote:
> walter tallent wrote:
> [ ... ]
> > How can the board send the
> > signal to both the game and the app and make sure
> that
> > game gets it first?  Or is there another mechanism
> > altogether I should be using to do this?
> 
> First of all, a signal is sent to signify that
> "something happened",
> generaly the order of signals handlers should be
> arbitrary for a good
> and solid design (except the signal handlers
> installed by the
> class ofcourse). Generaly, if this is important and
> you want to maintain
> a workable design, if you think about it your app
> isn't really interested
> in the "board" signal, your app is interested in the
> "game-recieved-and-processed-board" signal.
> 
> Note though, that singnals are marshalled in a
> first-come-first-serve manner,
> so in the game object constructor, which I assume
> creates its child board
> object, the game object will connect to the correct
> signals before exiting
> from its constructor, so technicly the app cant
> connect to board signals
> before the game can.
> 
> Cheers,
>                                   -Tristan
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



	
		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail