[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: autosave [was Re: Gnumeric 1.9.4 "Greased Weasel"]
- From: Jean Bréfort <jean brefort normalesup org>
- To: bill lam <cbill lam gmail com>
- Cc: Bréfort <jean brefort normalesup org>@men menubar gnome org, ubar gnome org menubar gnome org, gnumeric-list <gnumeric-list gnome org>, Jean menubar gnome org, Bréfort <jean brefort normalesup org>@menubar.gnome.org
- Subject: Re: autosave [was Re: Gnumeric 1.9.4 "Greased Weasel"]
- Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:21:17 +0100
Le mardi 10 mars 2009 à 14:56 +0800, bill lam a écrit :
> On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Jean Bréfort wrote:
> > Le mardi 10 mars 2009 à 12:49 +0800, bill lam a écrit :
> > > On Sat, 07 Mar 2009, Jean Bréfort wrote:
> > > > with goffice-0.7.3 and gnumeric-1.9.4 you need to compile goffice qitn
> > > > --without-gconf to get a .gnumericrc file. There is no more gnome
> > > > support in these versions.
> > >
> > > I compiled again using "--without-gconf" on debian lenny that is
> > > gnome-free. ./configure said --without-gconf is an invalid option, but
> > > it compiled successfully.
> > >
> > It is an option for goffice, not for gnumeric.:
> >
> > ~/goffice$ ./configure --help|grep gconf
> > --without-gconf Build without gconf use
> >
>
> Yes, it was for goffices and it gave that warning. I guess the
> configure script determined that gconf was not possible from my
> environment and when I asserted a superfluous --without-gconf, it gave
> a superfluous warning.
gconf is tested only if there is no --without-gconf around. I do not get
that message. Strange.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]