[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: IEEE 754 compliance
- From: Dave <dfeustel mindspring com>
- To: nashjc uottawa ca
- Cc: gnumeric-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: IEEE 754 compliance
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 13:33:25 +0000 (GMT)
The 754 standard is being updated and the result is being
voted on now, I think. It's called 754r and can be found
on the web. 16-bit and 128-bit floating point formats are
what led me to it.
Dave Feustel
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 08:50:45AM -0400, Prof J C Nash wrote:
>There are some resources for testing by Nelson Beebe at
>http://www.math.utah.edu/~beebe/software/ieee/timops.html From what I
>understand, the main issues are handling of edge effects (underflow,
>overflow, divide by 0, etc.) where compilers may do some things
>different from the standard's prescription. There is, of course, an
>interaction here with hardware that may not provide ways to get at the
>bits (literally).
>
>In my efforts to set up some Gnumeric test worksheets, I've tried to
>contact Beebe without success. He may have retired (I believe he is
>older than I, and I'm on the brink of retirement from teaching, but not
>from Gnumeric!)
>
>If there is interest, and in particular an example where IEEE754 may be
>important, I'll be happy to dig a bit. I was a corresponding (ie vote by
>mail) member of the IEEE 754 committee back in late 70s. Given the
>arcane detail, it will take a bit of review for me to get fully up to speed.
>
>
>JN
>
>_______________________________________________
>gnumeric-list mailing list
>gnumeric-list gnome org
>http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumeric-list
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]