Re: Content Licenses on WGO



We need a default license for wgo. Any recommendation?

I guess the first decision is if we go for GFDL or one of the
CreativeCommons family.

I have no strong opinion. Anyone?

On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 19:54 +0100, Thilo Pfennig wrote:
> The license issue should be raised for all content on *.gnome.org. I
> think it is possible to have a mix of licenses but the CMS must help
> the user to select a license (otherwise there should be a default
> one). This would allow us and others to exchange content with
> Wikipedia or other documentation projects .Not with OpenOffice.org or
> fedoraproject.org though because they choose some kind of minority
> licenses: PDL and OPL. Thats why I would rather prefer GFDL or one of
> the Creative Commons licenses.

-- 
Quim Gil /// http://desdeamericaconamor.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]