Il giorno dom, 11/09/2011 alle 16.40 -0400, Owen Taylor ha scritto: > On Sun, 2011-09-11 at 14:57 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 12:24:18AM -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com> wrote: > > > > Some review comments reading the code to sweettooth-plugin: > > > > What is/will be the status for GNOME 3.2? I'm writing (together with > > others) the release notes and I'd like to say something about this. > > > > even if not for GNOME 3.2, we could put it in the "looking forward" > > section (but then really brief) > > > > if it is going to be ready, some screenshots would be nice. Ok to give > > me links and so on or tell me how to create screenshots. > > The client side stuff is largely there to make the site work, but it's > not widely tested yet, and the server side is still very much a work > in progress. > > I think what makes sense is to have the site as a bit of a stealth-beta > for this release ... something we're still working on, something we > don't advertise as a release feature, but something that you can already > use. Which means that extension.gnome.org will be up and running (even if beta) in 3.2? I'm asking because I want to move my extensions to the website as soon as possible, and I'd like to know for how long I'll need to make tarball releases. I already skipped 3.1.90 / 3.1.91, hoping to have the website soon, but distro packagers will need 3.1.92 and 3.2.0 if they have to keep the packages. Giovanni
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part