Le jeudi 10 mars 2011 à 22:02 -0600, Justin Edwards a écrit : > Hiding things like this will make people think twice about giving > gnome-shell a try. If you can't perform simple tasks using obvious > methods, then the UI is not doing it's job. I like gnome-shell, but > I know how people are. > > > It might not do any good saying anything at this point, but it's such > a simple thing. > > > > Justin Edwards I'm agree with you. Reboot is needed for some reasons, the first is dualboot. And hide power off behind the Alt key encouraged to focus on suspend. A choice that, for no-geek users, wastes energy. This is contradictory with the choice to replace screen-saver by screen-off to save energy. I don't understand this contradictory choice from the dev team. :s Personaly, I think the better way is to have to differents entries and no only-one: Suspend and Stop. * "Suspend" show a system modal window, like the present-day system modal window of "Power Off", with two choices: "Quick Suspended" and "Long Suspended"[1]. Have a window add the posibility to confirm and save time in case of error from a mouse click. This window don't show applications running. * "Stop" show a system modal window, like the present-day system modal window of "Power Off", with the list of applications running and two choices: "Power Off" and "Restart". But if we want to remain coherent, User-Menu have anoters unlogicals entries: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643916 [1] I don't know if it's the better names. Maybe continue to use "Standby" and "Hibernate". Regards -- Gendre Sebastien <korbe romandie com>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part