Re: [Fwd: Re: Has the end come?]

["Richard J. Mancusi" <vrman execpc com>]

I re-read my email and now see how poorly it was written.  In no way
did I mean to imply that GnuCash is not good software or that it
didn't belong in Gnome Office.  The reason I forwarded the Moneydance
email was exactly opposite.  It was meant as a demo of the importance
of GnuCash.  What should be in an "Office" package - difficult to say.
Just because MS Money isn't in MS Office obviously doesn't mean GnuCash
shouldn't be in Gnome Office.  I was trying to say - hey, is the
Monydance situation all the more reason to take a good look at GnuCash.
I am VERY sorry for the error.

On another subject - I strongly agree with a previous email about the
importance of end-user function.  Obviously, ease/speed of programming
must be taken into consideration or there will never be a release.
However, the end-user expects certain attributes from basic cut-and-paste
across applications to Evolution Web and Email addresses available in
the browser.

tnx for your ear
Rich



Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-04-17 at 22:27, Richard J. Mancusi wrote:
> > There has been a great deal of good conversation about what should go
> > into gnome office.  I am not sure that GnuCash belongs - but this
> > email from Appgen regarding Moneydance causes one to think.
> >     
>
> Even if moenydance was magically turned to Free Software (it is quite
> non free, currently), GNUcash certainly does belong into Gnome Office.
>
> It's a very good application and is very usefull for (at the very least)
> one's personal finances.
>
> Hugs, rms
>
>