Re: Translation status for "core" Gnome 2.6

[pclouds <pclouds users sourceforge net>]

On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 11:20:53PM +0200, Danilo Segan wrote:
> What does everyone think of putting even the proposed modules in  
> categories in translation status pages where they would belong if they  
> were accepted?
> 
> E.g. so far, rhythmbox, gnome-system-tools, gnome-network and gdesklets  
> (these reside in Gnome CVS) have been proposed for inclusion in Gnome  
> 2.6, meaning there's a chance they might get included.
> 
> I think that it's better that we add all the potential modules to  
> desktop category, so we would avoid the situation we had with 2.4 --  
> gnopernicus, gok, and other (not small at all) modules where added to  
> desktop category pretty late, and many translators didn't have  
> translations available for them.
> 
> This way, we can relieve translators of tracking which modules might  
> get included, and which surely won't (i.e. they're not proposed at all  
> by module maintainers).

Could we mark those modules as "proposed" in the status page?

-- 
Bi Cờ Lao