Messages are ordered newest-to-oldest in this index. The newest
threads will be at the top of this page, the oldest will be at the bottom.
Within a single thread, the first mail note is the START of the
thread; the notes following that are in the chronological order of
when they were received. So globally, newest messages are at the top,
but within a thread, the oldest (the start of the thread) is at the
top.
If you think about it, it is confusing. Just go with the flow and everything will be all right.
- Product specific guidelines for triaging bugs,
Vincent Untz
- Re: GTK+ 2.7.0 released [unstable],
Mike Emmel
- Re: Merging po strings of gal (retired) into evolution,
Danilo Šegan
- Relocation of gnome servers [OUTAGE],
Owen Taylor
- Subversion on container,
Jeff Waugh
- Bugzilla: Reducing bugspam and finding patches,
Olav Vitters
- Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.11.3 Development Release,
Martin Sevior
- Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.11.3 Development Release,
Jeff Waugh
- Productivity suite (was Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.11.3 Development Release),
Christian Rose
- New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
Jeff Waugh
- Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
Rodrigo Moya
- Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
Jeff Waugh
- Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
Christian Rose
- Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
Jeff Waugh
- Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
Christian Rose
- Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
Jeff Waugh
- Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
Christian Rose
- Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
Jeff Waugh
- Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
msevior
- Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
Bill Haneman
- Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
Martin Sevior
- Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
Vincent Untz
- Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
Martin Sevior
- Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
Christian Rose
- Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
msevior
- Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
Bill Haneman
- Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
Mark McLoughlin
- Re: Productivity suite (was Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.11.3 DevelopmentRelease),
msevior
- Re: Productivity suite (was Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.11.3 DevelopmentRelease),
Murray Cumming
- Re: Productivity suite (was Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.11.3,
Christian Rose
- Re: Productivity suite (was Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.11.3 DevelopmentRelease),
Olav Vitters
- Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.11.3 Development Release,
Vincent Untz
- List of maintainers & tips for maintainers,
Vincent Untz
- Change in coordinatorship for the GNOME Translation Project,
Christian Rose
- Problems in building HAL from CVS using jhbuild,
Baishampayan Ghose
- Re: Subversion migration.,
Mikael Hallendal
- Re: Subversion Migration: the importance of maturity.,
Mark Galassi
Mail converted by MHonArc