Re: Making 2.26 Documentation Rock



Hi,

Il giorno dom, 11/01/2009 alle 14.41 -0600, Shaun McCance ha scritto:
> Do *NOT* set an initial status higher than "update".  Only
> use "update" if the document seems to describe Gnome 2.24
> reasonably well.  If the document is referring to a bunch
> of stuff from 2.16 or something, or if it just never had
> the information it should have, mark it as "incomplete"
> or even "stub".
> 
> If you have experience with DocBook and have committed to
> documentation in Gnome SVN before, you have my permission
> to commit initial status information to any document that
> is maintained by the GDP.  Otherwise, just send an email
> to the list with a patch so we can make sure it's right.

following up on what you wrote, I've edited a little bit Empathy's doc
adding the new status tracking. The updated document can be found in a
bug report [1], please take a look at it.

> After that, get writing.  Try to move through the status
> indicators.  Your first goal is to get a complete document
> structure with technically correct information.  Stay in
> touch with the mailing list, or ask question on the #docs
> channel on irc.gnome.org.

I'll be back working on that document in the next days/weeks, updating
the basic new features of Empathy and going a little bit further
expanding it. Comments are more than welcome. 

Cheers.

[1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=561033

-- 
Milo Casagrande <milo casagrande name>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Questa =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]