Re: Uniformity - licenses

[Jason Clinton <me jasonclinton com>]

On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 08:36, Robert Ancell <robert ancell gmail com> wrote:

On 22 October 2010 21:49, Christian Persch <chpe gnome org> wrote:
> Hi;
>
> Am Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:09:07 +0200
> schrieb "Thomas H.P. Andersen" <phomes gmail com>:
>> Gnome games is in many ways a messy module. I would like to have a
>> long term goal of making it more uniform.
>>
>> One thing is the differences in the license for each game/lib. Could
>> we agree on a goal to move towards a specific license? There seems to
>> already be a push towards GPL3+ (aisleriot, vala port of glchess).
>
> I've already changed all of my gnome modules to GPL 3+, so obviously I'm
> in favour of doing the same for gnome-games :)

I'm happy to comply with a standard GPL license - no particular
preference which one.

No preferences here either but we would need to get approval from all people whom have copyright claims in our code. That turns out to be quite a few people.