On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 17:03 -0400, Pat Suwalski wrote: > I believe they don't want to include the Mono/C# libraries on the live > CD, which is limited to 650M. > That's not the case; we still have Tomboy and Gbrainy on the CD so the incremental cost of f-spot is pretty small. Shotwell looks fairly cool. I particularly like the “event” organising concept. Non-destructive editing by way of operation stacks is also cool and interesting, but I'm not entirely sure how well it'll work long term. > --Pat > > On 30/06/10 04:57 PM, ceed wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've been reading recently that Shotwell is going to be the new default > > photo management tool for Ubuntu (and maybe even in Gnome). I'm an avid > > F-Spot user but installed Shotwell just to check it out. I can not see > > any reason why this should replace F-Spot, and when I read about > > Shotwell as the "future if Linux photo management" there's never > > anything about why it's should be the future. What is it that F-Spot > > supposedly is missing making Shotwell a better option? I'm not an > > applications developer, so I if it's something under the hood justifying > > this change I would not see it. As for functionality I find F-Spot alone > > to be a reason for using Gnome over KDE. There's nothing like it one > > Linux as far as I can see. I'm also worrying that if this change happens > > F-Spot is going to be left by the wayside. Please do not make that happen. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > f-spot-list mailing list > f-spot-list gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part