[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Evolution] (cyrus) shared folders still not supported?



On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 14:21 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 11:51 -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
>  
> > Let me ask then, in your cyrus account in evolution, typically you see
> > this hierachy:
> > 
> > Inbox
> >   folder 1
> >   folder 2
> >     sub-folder 1
> >   folder 3 
> >   ...
> > Junk
> > Trash
> > 
> > Where in that layout do your public folders show up?
> 
> Sorry for not replying earlier. I've asked the guy who set this up but
> he hasn't got back to me yet.

NP.

> Anyway, on our server I see a structure
> like this (from Evo):
> 
> Inbox
> Folder 1
> Folder 2

Ahhh!  This is interesting.  Your folders are not considered subordinate
of INBOX.  I think that's the "altnamespace" feature switch of Cyrus
IMAPD.  Perhaps I should give that a try.

> Junk
> Public Folder
>   Subfolder 1
>   Subfolder 2
> Trash
> Whatever
> 
> I see the same thing from Thunderbird and from our Webmail system (based
> on IMP).

Great to know.

> Note that our Cyrus is configured in "anonymous root" mode rather than
> the default "Inbox root" you seem to have, but I can't believe that
> makes a difference wrt shared folders.

Is "anonymous root" aka "altnamespace":

       altnamespace: 0
            Use the alternate IMAP namespace, where personal folders
reside at the same level in the hierarchy as INBOX.

> I'll write again if I get further info.

Thanx!

b.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]