[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [Evolution] Question about IMAP folders
- From: Patrick O'Callaghan <poc usb ve>
- To: "Patrick M. Kelecy" <pkelecy insightbb com>
- Cc: evolution-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] Question about IMAP folders
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 07:37:37 -0430
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 07:02 -0500, Patrick M. Kelecy wrote:
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 08:09:57 -0430
> > From: Patrick O'Callaghan <poc usb ve>
> > Subject: Re: [Evolution] Question about IMAP folders (Patrick Kelecy)
> > To: "Patrick M. Kelecy" <pkelecy insightbb com>
> > Cc: evolution-list gnome org
> > Message-ID: <1201696797 27952 2 camel bree>
> > Content-Type: text/plain
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 07:47 -0500, Patrick M. Kelecy wrote:
> > > Thanks to everyone who responded to this. The explanations really
> > > helped, and I understand better now how it works.
> > >
> > > There is just one thing I wanted to clarify with regard to the virtual
> > > "Junk" and "Trash" folders: -those are created by Evo (not the server) -
> > > right? And as I understand it, those are there just to show the user
> > > which messages have been marked as spam and which have been marked for
> > > "expunging". -Is that correct?
> >
> > Yes and yes.
> >
> > poc
>
>
> Thanks Patrick!
>
> BTW, I checked with my email provider (BlueHost) about changing the IMAP
> folder structure (i.e. not having all the imap folders "hang" from the
> inbox). According to them that structure is the IMAP standard and can
> not be changed (at least not with their service). So I guess I'll just
> live with it as it is. Not a big deal though.
I'm pretty sure they're wrong about it being "the standard". It's the
Cyrus default but the standard doesn't dictate it. Probably not worth
fighting over.
> Thanks again for the help.
De nada :-)
poc
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]