Re: [Evolution] Evolution does not support message's priority?

[Lonnie Borntreger <email borntreger com>]

On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 15:18 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 11:53 -0700, Lonnie Borntreger wrote:
> > Um, wrong answer.  He wanted to know if evolution supports message
> > priority, not "marking as important".  Message priority allows the
> > >>sender<< to assign a message priority from low = 5, to critical = 1
> > to the message in the hopes that it helps the receiver determine what
> > emails to read first.  This uses the "non-standard" mail header
> > X-Priority.
> 
> I don't know how it's represented underneath in the SMTP headers, but
> the feature I referred to DOES allow the sender to mark the message as
> important (using Insert->Prioritize Message).  You don't get to give it
> a discrete level from 1 to 5; it's either "important" or "normal".
> 
> But, if the SENDER marks it this way, when the recipient gets it it's
> marked with the extra "exclamation point" icon and the summary line is
> in red.

It's under Insert?  No wonder I missed the addition.

Lonnie