Re: [Evolution] Why Two Copies With List Replies?

["Arthur S. Alexion" <arthur alexion com>]

Lane is right.  It is inefficient and a time waster and I don't buy any
of the excuses I got to my similar previous post. (the suggestion was
that maybe the poster is not a list member -- nonsense)

Coincidentally, with this list being among the few that do not default
replies to the list, it is ironic that the MUA which is its subject
treats its "Reply to List" feature as "Reply to All".  There should be a
difference.


On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 22:41, simran wrote:
> Not that i use the feature myself... but i can see why its there. 
> Oftentimes, people filter based on the to address... i have filters
> saying ... if i'm on the 'To' or 'Cc' fields, then move it to the "read
> properly" folder... 
>
> On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 12:40, Lane P. Lester wrote:
> > I fail to understand the logic by which Reply to List generates
> > replies to both the author and the list. After all, the author is
> > subscribed to the list and will thereby receive two copies of the
> > reply. Why doesn't the function simply put the list address in the To
> > field?
> >
> > Lane
> >
> > Lane P. Lester / Madison County, Georgia
> > Running Linux more and Windows less
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> evolution maillist  -  evolution ximian com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
-- 
Arthur S. Alexion <arthur alexion com>
Arthur S. Alexion LLC